![]() 08/23/2017 at 14:15 • Filed to: Subaru, Rant, Yelling at the clouds | ![]() | ![]() |
I’ m reminded of !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
And it makes me !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
yes I know this is a doublepost of the car, I went looking for numbers on it and I came across the post I was about to write but had written already so here we are.
Insult to injury? I find out that Subaru has a 1.444:1 low range option on the 1.6 liter engine version of this car where available. Yeah, its a tiny engine with tiny power, but with the 4.444 final, and the 3.545 1st gear on the 5MT it can still put down about 20-25% more power to the wheels at slow speeds than even the newer more powerful 2.0i and X-Mode CVT (about 15% more power than the 2.0i with the 6MT)
Subaru, why you no offer low range? Do you not see how popular your cars are becoming for off road adventures again?
![]() 08/23/2017 at 14:30 |
|
When I bought my Outback last year I was sent a consumer survey about preferences for new options and whatnot. Low range was on the list. So they’re considering it. But I bet it’s so niche that it’s hard for them to justify the development/manufacturing costs. Japanese companies tend to be incredibly conservative business wise.
![]() 08/23/2017 at 14:40 |
|
I work for a dealer of Luxury Japanese cars; you have no idea how conservative they are. So infuriating.
![]() 08/23/2017 at 15:58 |
|
If the Forester makes it to the point where it doesn’t make sense as a daily, and if the 4EAT buys it, I’d seriously consider putting one in...
plus a host of other upgrades...
![]() 08/23/2017 at 16:02 |
|
I think your picture was ____
btw, you follow this guy?
https://www.youtube.com/user/IamDedman
![]() 08/23/2017 at 16:09 |
|
No picture, just a statement.
I don’t follow him, but I’ll have to watch some of those now. They seem interesting.
![]() 08/23/2017 at 16:10 |
|
he gets after it in his little low range SF forester.
![]() 08/23/2017 at 16:11 |
|